Saturday, February 20, 2010
Once more unto the breach!
Monday, December 7, 2009
Just what civilization needs...
Another weigh-in on the best films of the decade.
20 Honorable mentions, listed alphabetically:
25. The Squid and the Whale (Noah Baumbach)
24. The Fog of War (Errol Morris)
23. 25th Hour (Spike Lee)
22. Downfall (Oliver Hirschbiegel)
21. My Winnipeg (Guy Maddin)
20. The Best of Youth (Marco Tullio Giordana)
19. Capturing the Friedmans (Andrew Jarecki)
18. You Can Count on Me (Kenneth Lonergan)
17. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (Julian Schnabel)
16. No Country for Old Men (Ethan Coen, Joel Coen)
15. The Lives of Others (Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck)
14. Grizzly Man (Werner Herzog)
13. Y Tu Mama Tambien (Alfonso Cuaron)
12. Sideways (Alexander Payne)
11. Yi Yi (Edward Yang)
10. Brokeback Mountain (Ang Lee)
9. 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (Cristian Mungiu)
8. Spirited Away (Hayao Miyazaki)
7. Far from Heaven (Todd Haynes)
6. Zodiac (David Fincher)
5. Talk to Her (Pedro Almodovar)
4. In the Mood for Love (Wong Kar Wai)
3. There Will Be Blood (Paul Thomas Anderson)
2. Lost in Translation (Sofia Coppola)
1. Mulholland Dr. (David Lynch)
Friday, May 1, 2009
"And when it's done, we'll both be free..."
Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo—I’m sure I’ve seen the film 20 times. It inspired the longest, thorniest paper of my academic career. And though I chafe at perfunctory rankings of art, my perennial fascination with the Master’s most self-expressive work assures its place on that desert island for which connoisseurs prepare in itemized fashion.
Outshining its palpable wonderments, in my view, is its capacity to reveal uncharted pockets of genius on each viewing. Sometimes it’s a quick shot, sometimes an extended set piece; regardless, you always come away with newfound reverence for Hitchcock’s twisted virtuosity. I had occasion to watch it recently in a venue that did full justice to its grandeur, and this time my attention was seized by a quiet interlude which before then seemed like little more than connective tissue. (This is where I urge you to stop reading if you’ve never seen Vertigo—and let your artistic compasses know they've failed you.)
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Contemplation Row
Emerging from I’m Not There, Todd Haynes’s kaleidoscopic portrait of Bob Dylan in all his mutability of image, one emphatic gentleman proclaimed it “a totally unnecessary movie.” More than a brusque dismissal, this observation doubtless typifies the majority response to the work. Haynes’s film audaciously renders a chameleonic character, making no attempt to reconcile his disparate facades, and further clouding the point by dividing the Dylan role among six actors with no clear commonalities.
For a middle-of-the-road moviegoer, this approach breeds chaos and confusion. What good is biography that sheds no light on its subject? That uses technique to augment his obscurity—to pronounce him unknowable without aiming for a semblance of understanding?
As Louis Armstrong said of jazz, if you have to ask you’ll never know. All Dylanites, and I count myself as one, admit that their hero defies definition. True disciples know it would indeed take a half dozen performers including a black boy and a woman to capture his myriad personae.
As with Man on the Moon, the like-minded but less flamboyant Andy Kaufman head-scratcher, I’m Not There presumes the futility of seeking closure. Dylan is enigma incarnate, a figure who concurrently shaped and reflected a cultural moment; to ask for precision and unity is a fool's errand. Haynes is more concerned with ambiance than cohesion, so escapists are advised to look elsewhere.
Among the six incarnations of the artist, not one bears the name Bob Dylan. That’s fitting, as the stage name is no more authentic to Robert Zimmerman than any of the monikers assumed by his surrogates in the film, most of which harbor nonetheless some connection to the man as well as the myth. We get Woody Guthrie and Arthur Rimbaud, named for creative influences. We meet Jude Quinn, perhaps an homage to “Quinn the Eskimo”—a folk rock piece composed by Dylan during the interval that character bridges. At last we encounter Cowboy Billy, whose presence calls to mind the film Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, for which Dylan composed his quixotic ballad “Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door.”
Woody (Marcus Carl Franklin) is presented as a twelve-year-old African American, riding the rails and plucking populist tunes on his guitar like his namesake, despite the fact that Guthrie’s time had long since passed. The episode dates to 1959, and in a scene of great power and significance, Woody is rebuked for glamorizing the Depression-era plight of the hobo while civil rights crusades hover on the horizon. “Live your own time,” he is told, as if to quell the anachronism of the early Dylan recordings.
Having reinvented himself—in the first of many such instances—as a mouthpiece of the folk movement, Woody is replaced by Arthur (Ben Whishaw), a pastiche of anterior talents. The look of the picture changes accordingly. From the richly saturated hues of the wunderkind’s westward travels (echoing the palette employed by cinematographer Haskell Wexler in the 1976 Guthrie bio Bound for Glory), Haynes shifts to a gritty black and white—then back to less stylized color with the introduction of Jack (Christian Bale), a romantic Greenwich Village prodigy, and tinted green for our sojourn with Robbie (Heath Ledger), a Hollywood actor playing Jack in a meta-biopic.
The differentiation of texture between each sequence accomplishes a good deal more than helping us keep the stories straight. It evokes an array of memories (or impressions, for those of us too young to remember) of the media we associate with Dylan—the means of disseminating the man into the culture. This is most chillingly manifest in scenes depicting the embodiment called Jude (Cate Blanchett), culled directly from the touchstone of popular Dylan perception, D.A. Pennebaker’s 1967 documentary Don’t Look Back.
It’s within these scenes that lightning strikes. The remarkable Blanchett propels us through the legendary tour of
The miracle of Blanchett’s portrayal is her ability to capture both sides of the coin. We bristle as we recognize the narcissistic man-child who greets fans and biographers with abstract contempt. This is the Dylan recorded by Pennebaker four decades ago, from whom many fans remain alienated to this day. But we also glimpse the beleaguered, inexperienced songwriter from
Rounding out the collage—though in fact blurring its focus—is Billy (Richard Gere), hermitlike inhabitant of a folkloric town self-consciously named Riddle. As Billy rides his horse to the town square, all the villagers he passes are cloaked in Halloween attire and seem to be fortifying themselves for disaster. The elements of paranoia, camouflage and individualism suggest Dylan’s period of withdrawal after his mysterious motorcycle accident, followed by the release of his western-themed album John Wesley Harding. But the connection is shaky at best.
Ultimately these scenes are the film’s least successful. Shapeless and baffling, they supply unfortunate ammunition to critics of Haynes’s intrepid stylings. The word “pretentious,” while broadly applied to any feature aiming to sell ideas instead of popcorn, serves in its primary usage to critique works which “pretend” to function in ways they do not, or pretend to know what they’re doing when the opposite is plainly true. Whatever the Billy episode sought to achieve, it falls short, and must be classified as a pretentious supplement to a piece otherwise marked by assurance, not indulgence.
True, I’m Not There strikes the occasional false note. Verbal asides inspired by (or meant to inspire) Dylan lyrics, like Jude’s off-the-cuff utterance “That’s just like a woman,” land with the thud of Forrest Gumpist contrivance. Insertions of pop cultural icons range in their effectiveness—Julianne Moore channels Joan Baez note-perfectly in her few scenes, but Allen Ginsberg, Norman Mailer and others not bothering with pseudonyms feel shoehorned in.
Nevertheless, Haynes leaves us with a fascinating proposition: that an identity as fluid as Dylan’s couldn’t possibly be pinned down by a single actor or mise-en-scene. And in thrusting us headlong through clashing compositions, feeding us prodigal imagery to make our heads spin, he tenders perhaps the only viable agency for grasping the man and his time—as a raging, roving, psychedelic whirlwind.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
"Two Old Fashioneds. For two old-fashioned people."
What if I asked you which swath of the populace is most grievously neglected on film? Think it over. Consider quality of depiction as well as frequency. There’s no right answer, of course, but I’ll bet my answer differs from yours. And if that’s the case, I’ll wager it’s not because you think my party gets a fair shake, but because conditions are so inequitable it was never on the table to begin with.
I'm thinking of the elderly.
Meaning no offense, I believe that of all the “-isms” that fracture our society, ageism meets with the most unperturbed indifference. Nowhere on earth is this truer than in
Maybe you’re thinking: Wait, I can name lots of actors in their seventies and they’re still going strong! Have you forgotten Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman? No, but I wish I could forget The Bucket List. Only the latest submission to an endless cycle of pernicious fairy tales (let’s call them Cocooners, after Ron Howard’s execrable prototype), the film purports that loneliness can be cured and vitality regained by jumping out of airplanes with newfound friends. Oh, but the two leads have terminal cancer. Do you imagine people with that prognosis are more apt to spend their last days: a) knocking around the Pyramids with formulaically mismatched sidekicks, or b) trying to stabilize their anesthesia so they’re lucid enough to enjoy the company of loved ones for as long as their escalating pain will permit?
Who wants to watch a film about torturous decline, you might ask—surely not old people! Well, who wants to watch a film about teenage prostitution, gang warfare or meth addiction? Lots of people! The key difference is that those movies end with deceptive catharses, whereas life in twilight can only end in death—and as heartfelt as that may be, it’s also messy, humiliating and sad. Sadder still in many cases are the preceding years, marked by solitude and degradation (not confined to the physical strain). Should you ever question your capacity to empathize with fellow human beings, watch the first twenty minutes of Bryan Forbes’s The Whisperers; they will serve as your litmus test. An Englishwoman of about eighty trudges to the welfare office to claim her subsistence check, then to church where she’s compelled to sing hymns for nourishment, then to the public library to warm her feet on the pipes. That act of indignity gets her expelled from the premises. In his initial review, Roger Ebert posed a question that society is too content to read as rhetorical: “What is it about the Puritan culture, in England and in this country, that makes it necessary for the old and the hungry to shame themselves in order to get the necessities of life?”
To further his inquiry, what is it about the commercial culture, in this country above all, that makes it necessary for the old and the weak to occupy positions of marginality? Death is everywhere in movies and we’re fine with it, just as long as it’s unplanned and unnatural. “Because we’ve come to see death as a failure to keep living, normal death is stripped of meaning, which renders it terrifying,” observes Pomona Prof. Lauri Mullens. But why should something as universal and inescapable as human mortality be terrifying?
Australia-based filmmaker Paul Cox understands that it needn’t be. His exquisite productions, Innocence and A Woman’s Tale, explore the jubilation of life and the weary, wistful sorrow of its passing. The greatest of all films on seniority—and among the greatest of all films—is Yasujiro Ozu’s Tokyo Story, a trenchant reflection on the unwillingness of young people hurriedly leading their lives to make room for old people still (inconveniently) living theirs. Depressing in its allegations but exhilarating in its candor, Ozu’s masterpiece is brave enough to conclude with a casual expression of life’s disappointments, arriving in a manner both startling and overdue.
The U.S. Census Board reports that 13% of our population is 65 or above. What can that demographic expect from
As expected, the third array concerns treatment of corporeal/neurological failure. Unsentimental works of this type are rare enough, but they’re a dime a dozen compared to the paltry contingent of honest meditations on the emotional cost of longevity. Surviving your life partner or feeling ill at ease with technology and estranged from the younger generations tap into deep-seated cultural anxieties. If we fear one thing more than death, it’s obsolescence. There’s vicious irony in the volume of movies devoted to quarter-life turmoil. Restlessness we embrace, uselessness we scorn.
At last we reach the eternal argument for visibility at all costs. Yes, I prefer twinkly, garbage-mouthed Alan Arkin to no Arkin at all, but there should be a third avenue—one that confronts the winter of life with compassion, fidelity and truth. Is life disappointing? Undeniably. Can the plight be acknowledged? Why else do movies exist?
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Spencer Tracy in The Last Hurrah
When it comes to Spencer Tracy, “the ultimate actor’s actor” is less a figure of speech than a matter of consensus. He was the favorite screen performer of legions of colleagues including Clark Gable, Katharine Hepburn, Humphrey Bogart, James Cagney, and Richard Widmark, and Sir Laurence Olivier claimed, “I’ve learned more about acting from watching Tracy than in any other way.” He was a truck salesman’s son from Milwaukee who, by his own account, flunked out of 15 or more grammar schools and considered the hallmarks of his profession to be “Know your lines, show up on time, and don’t bump into the furniture.” Yet he possessed an instinct for the nuances of screen acting that most performers can only envy.
Unlike Olivier, his technique was invisible; unlike Cagney and Bogart, he had no trademark mannerisms. “There’s nothing to imitate except his genius,” Cagney proclaimed, “and that can’t be mimicked.” His greatest talent was his ability to listen, not as an actor awaiting his cue, but as an inhabitant of the scene, absorbing information as it’s offered and responding with an immaculate air of spontaneity. “Effortless” is too glib a descriptor for Tracy’s style: it’s not that he appears to do nothing; it’s that he appears to do nothing planned. His reactions feel motivated not by plot necessity but by situational urgency.
Ironically, it’s that very naturalism which tends to keep
him eclipsed in the pantheon of stars. As Cagney notes, a Tracy impression
would consist of little more than intelligence and reserve—hardly nightclub
fodder—and this may have cost him a personality cult. Hindsight being a
sentimental bird, it’s likely that he’s best remembered for his nine pairings
with Katharine Hepburn, grounding her New England dithering with his Midwestern
pragmatism. Though he was always a great deal more than her foil, Tracy’s gifts were in
fullest flower elsewhere—as the lynch mob survivor in Fury (1936), the Colonial militia leader in Northwest Passage (1940), the concentration camp escapee in The Seventh Cross (1944), the one-armed
stranger in Bad Day at Black Rock
(1955), and perhaps above all, the bare knuckle politician in The Last Hurrah (1958).
The latter film is fascinating to watch during election
season, as we are reminded just how much of campaigning is political theater.
We don’t need director John Ford or screenwriter Frank Nugent to tell us that charisma
counts for more than policy on the stump, but seeing a veteran actor take on
the role of statesman affords a sense of balance in times when the inverse
dominates the airwaves—and shows how actorly control (or calculated lack of it)
undergirds every discerning campaign.
Adapted from Edwin O’Connor’s novel of the same name, The Last Hurrah marked Tracy’s first and
only pairing with Ford since the star’s debut feature, Up the River (1930). He plays Frank Skeffington, a populist
Irish-American mayor making a last bid for reelection, eschewing modern office-seeking
methods for the same cocktail of speeches, rallies, and personal appearances
that worked so well in the past—and with the same steadfast crew of Runyonesque
ward heelers, portrayed by character actors extraordinaire (and fellow members
of Tracy’s “Irish Mafia”) Pat O’Brien, James Gleason, and Edward Brophy.
Skeffington knows the days of the old-style candidate are numbered, but the
slum-born mayor seeks one final victory for self-made politicians against the
city’s moneyed elite and the callow law school grads they endorse.
The superficially guileless star is an ideal choice for
Skeffington, as shrewd a politico as Tracy was an actor. Skeffington works
every angle clandestinely, listening with rapt attention, charming and
manipulating all while feigning transparency—in both men’s discharge of their
duties, five or six things are always happening beneath the surface. Most
scenes consist of Tracy entering a room and effectuating a desired outcome, and
the actor uses every aspect of his mien to make this plausible. His attentive
eyes are always reading the crowd—sometimes literally, when his irises shift in
thought as he contemplates his next move. Even the tilt of his head is
communicative: bowed slightly, doubling his chin, to show sympathy or
condescension (the latter sometimes taking the pose of the former), or even
righteousness depending on the angle. Whimsy and melancholy coalesce in his
tone as he speaks confidingly of his methods, punctuating his cadence with redolent
pauses (“I speak in fight arenas…armories…street corners…anywhere I can gather
a crowd…I even kiss babies!”) He finds the sly comedy in a scene where he
blackmails a foe by making the man’s feckless son city fire commissioner.
Overplaying by perhaps 10 percent so his aide will catch his drift, Tracy
grandstands about “men of daring” and emphasizes the absurdity of words like
“big red car,” nodding appreciatively at the fireman’s helmet as the young
stooge laps it up. He affects the faintest brogue in the company of Irish
constituents, and places his hand on the shoulders of those who need extra
persuasion. But as he’s seducing them, he’s seducing the audience. However we
feel about Frank Skeffington, Spencer Tracy knows how to win votes.
In a scene so pregnant with mawkish potential that perhaps
only Ford and Tracy could make it work, Skeffington takes his nephew (Jeffrey
Hunter) to an alleyway on skid row. “The Castle of Dramore,” a harp-laced Irish
lullaby, plays on the soundtrack as a baby cries out from a second story
apartment. Fedora cocked, Tracy climbs two steps of the fire escape, gazes up
in the direction of the wailing and intones, “I was born here, Adam.” We’re
inclined to read the screen as we would a book, the flow of time moving in a
rightward, downward course, so Tracy’s gaze into the space beyond the northwest
corner of the frame intimates he’s staring into his own past—the cries harking
back to a time when his forum was not city hall but a ramshackle tenement. He
strikes a match to show Hunter where he carved his initials on a wooden post, above
those of the girl who would become his late wife. With most of his face shaded
by the fedora, he has only the wrinkled smile illuminated by the tinder stick
to express his feelings, and he manages a look of reverie and pain that sails
past craft into the realm of the sublime.
Even when Tracy is shot from behind—shoulders square, hands
concealed—he conveys intent. But despite its laid-back effect, it’s quite a
busy performance; he’s forever pacing and coming to rest, modulating his rich,
protean voice not just in volume and speed but in hardness. In his first scene
with Hunter, he speaks almost continuously for three and a half minutes of
politics as “the greatest spectator sport in the country today.” We are too
entranced to be distracted by (and indeed we’re hardly are aware of) the
blocking: Skeffington lights a cigarette, takes a seat, rises and walks to the
window, doubles back and reclaims his chair, stubs out the cigarette, stands,
picks a match from the floor, returns to the window, turns around, pitches the
match (on the verbal cue “Last hoo-rah”), and thrusts his hand in his pocket. In
his unassuming way, he makes even elaborate stage business seem organic.
But most of all there’s the face, creased from a lifetime of
battles, with an easy smile borne of confidence in his skill and sparkling,
searching eyes. And in keeping with the plaintive tone of The Last Hurrah, as we canvass the latter-day denizens of Hollywood
and Washington, we can permit ourselves the slightest pangs of nostalgia.
Mister, we could use a man like Spencer Tracy again.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
As the world holds its breath...
Presenting...the 2008 Golden Steve Awards.